MIC conviction :: Essays Papers

MIC convictionIntroductionThree aviation students with similar cases involving Minor in Consumption charges bequeath be discussed. The three students are Mr. rogue Daniels, Mr. Johnnie Walker, and Ms. Brandy Wine. We will look at each student separately and answer questions pertaining to each of their situations. Some of the questions include whether or not the students need to comply with the inform requirement of 14 CFR 61.15. What, if any, reports do they have to make on their next medical? We will also discuss Ms. Wines situation, whether or not the police stop violated the Fourth Amendment.Mr. Jack DanielsMr. Daniels was cited for Minor in Consumption of Alcohol, pled guilty, and was sentenced to pay a $100 fine. Mr. Daniels wants to know what he needs to do to comply with the FAA so that he can remain a pilot. According to 14 CFR 61.15(e), Each person holding a certificate issued under this donation shall provide a written report of each motor vehicle deed to the FAA . . . no later than 60 days after the motor vehicle action. To determine whether Mr. Daniels must comply with this regulation, a motor vehicle action must be defined. As per 14 CFR 61.15(c), a motor vehicle action means(1) A conviction after November 29, 1990, for the violation of any Federal or State statute relating to the operation of a motor vehicle art object intoxicated by inebriantic drink or a drug, while impaired by alcohol or a drug, or while under the cast of alcohol or a drug(2) The cancellation, suspension, or revocation of a permit to operate a motor vehicle after November 29, 1990, for a have got related to the operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated by alcohol or a drug, while impaired by alcohol or a drug, or while under the influence of alcohol or a drug(3) The denial after November 29, 1990, of an application for a license to operate a motor vehicle for a cause related to the operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated b alcohol or a drug, wh ile impaired by alcohol or a drug, or while under the influence of alcohol or a drug.Mr. Daniels was not involved with a motor vehicle therefore, he does not fall under any of these definitions of a motor vehicle action. This means that Mr. Daniels will not have to report to the FAA.